Negotiate
Interests, not positions.
The problem category
At some point you’ll sit across a table from someone who wants something different from what you want and can get up and walk away. A landlord at lease-renewal time. A supplier setting a price. A business partner deciding how to split things up. A future employer with a job offer. None of them has to say yes to you, and you don’t have to say yes to them.
That’s the negotiate muscle. In these exercises there are two sides, and each gets a confidential brief: who they are, what they care about, how much every possible outcome is worth to them, and a walk-away, the backup they’ll take if there’s no deal. The two sides meet and negotiate live. They agree on every issue, or they walk. Then the scores come out and everyone learns what the other side secretly wanted.
The other side is a real person with a hidden hand. The only way to do well is to understand them.
The one big idea
Interests, not positions.
A beginner negotiates positions. “I want $2,600 a month.” “No, $2,000.” A tug-of-war over one number, where for one side to win the other has to lose. It feels like the whole game. It isn’t even half of it.
A skilled negotiator digs under the position for the interest, the why. Why $2,600? Maybe you need predictable income. Maybe you’re worried about a repair bill. Once you know the why, you often find the two sides care about different things, and a door opens. You can give the other side something worth more to them than it costs you, in exchange for something worth more to you than it costs them. Both sides come out ahead. Nobody had to lose.
Every deal in this book hides a trade like that. A team that only argues the obvious number fights to a tense compromise and leaves the trade on the table. A team that goes looking for the trade grows the pie. The deals are built so that lesson can’t be dodged. The catch: a trade is rarely free. Usually it costs you a little and is worth a lot to them, and the skill is telling those two amounts apart.
How to tackle it
- Prepare on paper first. Before you say a word, write down your interests (what you actually care about, not just your opening number), your target, and your walk-away.
- Know your walk-away, and honor it. Your walk-away, sometimes called your BATNA, your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement, is the deal you’ll take if this one falls through. It’s the only thing that tells you when to say no. A deal worse than your walk-away is worse than no deal.
- Guess the other side’s interests before you sit down. You’ll be wrong about some of it, but the habit of asking “what do they really want?” is what separates good negotiators from loud ones.
- Ask questions and listen. The other side knows things you don’t. You can’t find the trade without learning what they value, and you learn that by asking, not talking.
- Price a concession before you give it. The best trades cost you a little and are worth a lot to them. A concession that quietly costs you a lot isn’t a trade, it’s a loss. Check before you hand one over.
- Create value before you claim it. Grow the pie first: trade across the issues you value differently. Then split the one issue you’re truly fighting over. Trade first, haggle second.
The traps
- Fighting only the obvious number. Spend all your time on price and you’ll miss the trade that was worth more than the price.
- Talking instead of asking. You can’t learn their interests while your own mouth is moving.
- Giving something away without pricing it. “Free” concessions are sometimes expensive.
- Signing a bad deal. Walking away is allowed, and sometimes right. A deal worse than your backup should be refused, not signed to fill an awkward silence.
The trade-off table
Before you walk into the room, make a small table. List every issue on the table down the side. Give it two money columns: what each issue is worth to you, and, your best guess, what it’s worth to them. You won’t have their real numbers, so infer them from what you can observe, the way a real negotiator does.
Now read the table. The rows where the two columns disagree are your trades. Where an issue is cheap to you and dear to them, give it. Where it’s dear to you and cheap to them, ask for it. Each such swap hands the other side something they value more than it costs you, and wins you something you value more than it costs them. Both of you come out ahead, and no one had to lose.
One row is different: the issue you both want the same way, usually the obvious number. That’s the true fight, the one place growing the pie won’t help. Spend your haggling there, and pay for the ground you take with concessions from the cheap-to-you rows. Trade the disagreements, fight the agreement.
Worked walkthrough: The Brewery Lot
Sunny wants a regular spot to park the truck. A brewery down the road has a big lot, a crowd every weekend, and no food. Could be perfect for both. Sunny is going to negotiate with the brewery’s manager. Three issues are on the table.
- The nightly spot fee. What Sunny pays to park. The obvious tug-of-war.
- Which nights Sunny commits to. The brewery is busiest Thursday through Saturday and would love a guaranteed food option on those nights.
- Exclusivity. The brewery doesn’t want Sunny also parking at the rival taproom down the street.
Step 1. Sunny’s prep. Interests: a steady, high-traffic spot and low cash going out. Target: a busy weekend spot at little or no fee. Walk-away: keep roving to random spots around town, which Sunny knows is worth a certain, lower amount of business.
Step 2. Weigh each issue, and mind the wrong turn. Sunny looks at the brewery’s wish list and thinks: easy, give them everything. Commit to all three nights, grant exclusivity, and beat down the fee in return. Both of those cost me nothing.
Stop. One of them does cost something. Exclusivity really is free: Sunny has no interest in the rival taproom and was never going to park there, so granting it is worth a lot to the brewery and nothing to Sunny. But a blanket Thursday-through-Saturday lock isn’t free. A few Fridays a season, a private catering job comes up worth about $400 in an evening, far more than a normal Friday on the lot. Committing to every Friday means turning those down. That’s a real cost Sunny nearly gave away by calling it free.
Step 3. In the room, ask first. Instead of opening with the fee, Sunny asks what matters most to the brewery. The answer: reliable food on event nights so drinkers stay longer. Not really about the fee at all.
Step 4. Structure the trade so the cheap parts are given and the costly part is protected. Sunny offers exclusivity, which is free, and a firm commitment to Thursday and Saturday, also cheap, since those are prime nights Sunny wants anyway. On Friday, Sunny commits with a carve-out: “I’ll be here every Friday, except I keep the right to miss up to one Friday a month for a catering I’ve booked in advance, with a week’s notice.” The brewery still gets a reliable Friday almost every week, nearly all the value to them, and Sunny keeps the occasional $400 night. In exchange for the package, Sunny asks for a very low or zero nightly fee.
Step 5. Check it against the walk-away, and close. The deal is a busy, reliable weekend spot at almost no cash cost, with Sunny’s high-value Fridays protected. Comfortably better than roving around town, so it beats Sunny’s walk-away, and it hands the brewery its top priority, so it beats theirs. Both sides can say yes and mean it. Shake on it.
Here’s the difference the thinking makes.
| Fee-only haggle | Give it all away “free” | The structured trade | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What gets discussed | Just the fee | All issues, fast | All issues, weighed |
| Exclusivity | Never raised | Granted (fine, it’s free) | Granted (fine, it’s free) |
| Friday commitment | Never raised | Blanket lock, no carve-out | Committed, with a catering carve-out |
| The fee | Ground to a tense middle | Low, but a costly Friday lock given up | Low, and the costly part protected |
| Result | One winner, one grudging | Looks great until a $400 Friday shows up | Both above their walk-away, no hidden loss |
The fee-only team never finds the trade. The give-it-all-away team finds the trade but doesn’t price it, and eats a $400 loss the first time a Friday catering lands. The team that weighs each concession gets nearly all the value with none of the hidden cost.
What good looks like
A weak answer:
Sunny asks what the brewery wants, hears “reliable weekend food,” and offers a full Thursday-through-Saturday commitment plus exclusivity in exchange for a low fee. The brewery happily agrees. Sunny signs, pleased to have found the trade.
Most of the way there. Sunny did the hard part: asked about interests instead of just haggling, and found the commitment-for-fee trade. But Sunny priced the Friday lock at zero when it wasn’t, and signed away every Friday catering for the season without noticing. The first $400 Friday that comes up, Sunny either breaks the deal or eats the loss. A good trade, given away one carve-out short.
A strong answer is the structured deal above: the free concessions given freely, the costly one protected with a carve-out, a low fee, and both sides above their walk-away.
Negotiation challenges are scored on four things: preparation (interests, target, and walk-away before you start), value creation (finding the trades, not just fighting the number), communication and relationship (clear, honest, someone they’d deal with again), and deal quality (a deal good for both sides, or a wise walk-away). The weak answer scores well on preparation and communication and loses points on deal quality, because it left a real cost unpriced.
One more habit worth naming: walking away is a legitimate outcome and sometimes the best one. If every deal on offer is worse than your backup, the disciplined move is to leave. Signing a bad deal to avoid the discomfort of no deal is the one thing the scoring truly punishes.
A second walkthrough: The Tortilla Squeeze
Sunny’s tortilla supplier calls with bad news. The little family tortilleria that presses Sunny’s tortillas fresh every morning is raising its price. The per-burrito tortilla cost goes from $0.50 to $0.80, thirty cents more on every burrito. Sunny sells about 1,000 burritos a month, so this is real money.
Step 1. See what the increase does to contribution. The burrito still sells for $9. Food cost was $3.00, which held contribution at $6.00. Add thirty cents of tortilla and food cost becomes $3.30.
$9.00 − $3.30 = $5.70 contribution, down from $6.00. Across 1,000 burritos a month: $0.30 × 1,000 = $300 a month gone.
Step 2. The wrong turn. Sunny’s first instinct is to fight the number head-on: “Thirty cents is robbery, hold your old price or I’m gone.” Fighting only the price, and threatening to leave, is the trap from the top of the chapter. It turns a supplier who likes Sunny into an opponent, and the threat is half a bluff anyway, because the walk-away isn’t free.
Step 3. Know the walk-away. Sunny’s real backup is a big regional distributor. Their tortillas land at $0.70 per burrito, food cost $3.20, contribution $5.80. Better than the supplier’s new $5.70, but the distributor demands large minimum orders, delivers on its own rigid schedule, and the tortillas are the bland shelf kind, not fresh-pressed. So the honest walk-away is $5.80 a burrito with strings attached and worse quality.
Distributor walk-away: $9.00 − $3.20 = $5.80 contribution.
Step 4. Find the trade. Why is the tortilleria raising prices? Sunny asks. Cash is tight, and pressing and delivering one small order at a time is a hassle. So Sunny offers what is cheap to give and dear to them: a standing weekly order Sunny was placing anyway, cash on delivery instead of thirty-day terms, and a testimonial for their website. In exchange, the tortilleria holds the price at $0.60, only a dime over the old rate.
Traded price: $9.00 − $3.10 = $5.90 contribution. Across 1,000 burritos: the dime costs $100 a month, not $300.
Step 5. Check it against the walk-away, and close. At $5.90 the deal beats the distributor’s $5.80, and Sunny keeps the fresh tortillas and a supplier who now has steady cash. The tortilleria beats its own walk-away too: instead of losing the account to the distributor, it lands a guaranteed order and faster money. Both sides above their walk-away. Shake on it.
Here’s the difference the thinking makes.
| Fight the price | Threaten to leave | The structured trade | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What gets discussed | Just the thirty cents | “Hold it or I walk” | Term, payment, and price together |
| The price | Ground down a little, bad blood | Distributor at $0.70, strings attached | Held at $0.60, a dime over old |
| Contribution | About $5.75 | $5.80, worse quality | $5.90, fresh tortillas kept |
| The relationship | Strained | Ended | Stronger, steady order |
| Result | Small win, sour supplier | Above walk-away by luck, quality lost | Both above walk-away, quality kept |
The fight-the-price team saves a nickel and makes an enemy. The threaten-to-leave team stumbles above its walk-away but eats bland tortillas to get there. The team that trades gives away only what is cheap and keeps both the quality and the friend.
Try It: Read the Other Side
Your turn, and this time do what a real negotiator does: work out what the other side wants from what you can observe, because nobody hands you their numbers. The worked answer is in Appendix A.
Sunny is negotiating a tortilla supply deal. Two issues are in play, the delivery day and the payment terms.
What Sunny knows and wants: Monday delivery would be ideal, so the week starts fresh for the busy stretch. On payment, Sunny would mildly prefer to pay in 30 days, but the truck runs on cash and paying on delivery is no real hardship.
What Sunny has observed about the supplier: it’s a small family operation. Last visit, the owner mentioned that cash had been tight this quarter, and grumbled that Mondays are chaos, since that’s the day their whole truck goes out to the big grocery accounts.
Sunny’s walk-away: a larger distributor that delivers Wednesdays and requires payment on delivery, which Sunny rates as “okay, not great.”
From those observations, work out what each of the two issues is probably worth to the supplier. Then name the trade that would make both sides better off. Finally, decide: is a deal of “Wednesday delivery, pay on delivery, same price” better or worse than Sunny’s walk-away, and what should Sunny do about it?
Work it out, then check Appendix A.
More practice
Four more. Work them on paper, then check Appendix A.
1. The Commissary Kitchen. Sunny needs to rent time in a shared commercial kitchen to prep. Two issues: the monthly rent, and whether Sunny gets early-morning access (5 to 7 a.m.) for prep before service. Sunny wants that early access, and is happy to sign a long lease, planning to stay a while. The owner mentioned they’re “trying to lock in steady tenants, the month-to-month people keep leaving,” and that “early mornings are tight, our wholesale baker is in then.” Work out what each issue is worth to the owner, and name the trade Sunny should reach for.
2. Walk or Deal? A client offers Sunny a catering job: 100 burritos for a flat $600. Sunny’s costs are $3 of food per burrito plus 6 hours of extra labor at $18 an hour, and taking the job means closing the truck for a normal day that usually nets Sunny about $250 in contribution. Compute what the gig is really worth against staying open, then decide: take it, walk, or counter, and at what price?
3. The Cooler Deal. Sunny is negotiating with a soda distributor for the truck’s drinks. Two issues: whether Sunny displays the distributor’s branded cooler and signage on the truck, and the price per case. Sunny doesn’t much care about branding, a logo on the cooler is no bother, but wants a low case price. The rep let two things slip: “my regional manager is on me to get our branding onto more trucks this quarter,” and “honestly we over-ordered summer cans, the warehouse is packed.” Sunny’s walk-away: a wholesale club that sells the same cans at a flat, ordinary price, no negotiating. Work out what each issue is worth to the distributor, then name the trade Sunny should reach for.
4. The Wedding Gig. A couple asks Sunny to cater their reception: 80 burritos for a flat $520. Sunny’s costs are $3 of food per burrito plus 5 hours of extra labor at $18 an hour, and taking the job means closing the truck for a normal Saturday that usually nets about $240 in contribution. Work out what the gig is really worth against staying open, then decide: take it, walk, or counter, and at what price?
Take it live (optional)
Ready to test this muscle for real? Each of the five programs has a bank of live team challenges, run with a facilitator. You don’t need them to finish the book; the walkthrough and practice above already cover the skill. To show you exactly what one looks like, here is a full Negotiate deal, including the hidden points tables. Read it as a case, or run it: split into two teams, give each only its own side, and keep the answer key for the facilitator. The other four in this bank stay sealed, so they’re fresh when you compete.
A full challenge: The Corner Lease
The setup. The Coconut Grove Cafe sits on a busy downtown corner, and its five-year lease is up. The café and the building’s landlord sit down to renew or part ways. One team is the Café (the tenant), the other the Landlord. Three things are on the table, and a deal has to settle all three:
- Monthly rent: one of four levels, $2,000, $2,200, $2,400, or $2,600 (only these four).
- Lease term: 1, 3, or 5 years.
- The renovation: a $6,000 storefront and HVAC upgrade, paid by the tenant, the landlord, or split.
If they can’t agree, each side takes its outside option, its walk-away.
The Café’s brief. Cash is tight after a slow winter, so rent hurts and fronting $6,000 for the renovation would sting this year. But you secretly plan to stay for years, so a long lease costs you almost nothing. Your backup is a cheaper space across town with much worse foot traffic: real, but you’d hate it.
The Landlord’s brief. Nothing costs you more than a vacancy: months of no rent, a new tenant search, a dead-looking corner. A long, reliable lease is the prize. You’d also happily fund the renovation, since it’s your building and the upgrade raises its value. Your backup is to re-list and hope, which is slow and uncertain.
Facilitator answer key. Each option is worth points to each side; a team’s score is the sum across the three issues.
| Issue | Options | Café points | Landlord points | Joint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rent | $2,000 / $2,200 / $2,400 / $2,600 | 60 / 40 / 20 / 0 | 0 / 20 / 40 / 60 | 60 always |
| Term | 1-year / 3-year / 5-year | 15 / 10 / 5 | 0 / 30 / 60 | 15 / 40 / 65 |
| Renovation | Tenant pays / split / Landlord pays | 0 / 15 / 30 | 20 / 15 / 5 | 20 / 30 / 35 |
Read the joint column, because it is the lesson. Rent is a pure tug-of-war: every level sums to 60, so a dollar of rent just moves points from one side to the other and never grows the pie. Term is where the value lives: the café barely cares (15 down to 5), the landlord cares enormously (0 up to 60), so a 5-year lease creates 50 points out of almost nothing, and the café should get paid for it in rent. The renovation is a smaller trade: the joint is highest when the landlord pays, because it costs the landlord 15 points and hands the café 30.
The pie is biggest, joint 160, at a 5-year term with the landlord funding the renovation. Rent only decides the split. A strong outcome: $2,200, 5-year, landlord pays, giving the Café 75 and the Landlord 85. Walk-aways are Café 55 and Landlord 50, and a deal below a side’s number scores that side its walk-away instead. Claiming has a limit: push rent to $2,400 and the café sits at exactly its 55 floor, so a sharp café refuses. The team that just splits the rent and grabs a 1-year term “to stay flexible” lands the café at 50, below its floor, worse than the space across town. The trade was hiding in the lease term the whole time.
The rest of the Negotiate bank
Four more, sealed for fresh scored play. Prepare your interests, target, and walk-away first; ask more than you tell; price your concessions before you give them; and find the trades before you split the number.
- The House Blend (a café and its coffee roaster). Four issues and a year-long relationship to protect.
- The Split (two barbershop partners breaking up). Emotional stakes, and structuring a payout and a non-compete.
- The Group Rate (an escape room and a corporate client). Five issues, most of them secretly win-win, if you stop assuming a fight.
- The Hire (a juice bar and a manager candidate). A job offer, the negotiation you’ll actually have in real life.
Going deeper
Most real negotiations have more than three issues, and a relationship that outlives the single deal. The next skills are packaging many issues at once, where not every one is a fight, and protecting the relationship so you get the next deal too. The bank scales both up.
From In the Chair, free under CC BY 4.0. Download the PDF or the EPUB.